The a client could impair the psychologist’s objectivity,

Published by admin on

The American Psychological Association’s Ethics Code makes it very clear about psychologists being about to hold the utmost professionalism, and with good reasoning. In therapy, boundaries are created to not only protect the client’s vulnerability and safety but also to help the therapist remain effective during treatment. The foundation of a client-therapist relationship is built on trust, respect, and boundaries, and those key things should be valued even after the treatment has ended. According to the textbook, having any sort of unprofessional relationship with a client could impair the psychologist’s objectivity, competence, or effectiveness in performing their functions as a psychologist. All which are key things that a psychologist should uphold according to the ethical standards. Competence and effectiveness are both things that a clinician should be equipped with when going into a therapeutic relationship with a client. If both are being hindered because of an unprofessional relationship, then both the effectiveness and outcome of the treatment are at stake. The whole reasoning behind the client seeking therapy would be compromised.    The textbook also states that psychologists are prohibited from becoming sexually involved with a client for at least two years after treatment ends, even longer if necessary. So, it could be argued that the professional nature of the relationship has diminished with time. However, the risk of the former client’s vulnerability and trust could be exploited because of the things that the therapist now knows. A relationship should start with a clean slate and an even playing field. This wouldn’t be the case with a former client and clinician. The former clinician would still hold the power in the relationship and could possibly use that to their advantage if they decide to. This example should be taken into consideration during the conversation about the time limit between both client and clinician.In conclusion, the foundation of a client-therapist relationship is based on boundaries and those boundaries should still be carried out even after the professional relationship has ended. The competence, effectiveness, and objectivity of the psychologist should never be questioned during or even after treatment, being that those are a few of the ethical standards that are strictly enforced. Sticking to the boundaries that were made during before treatment began would be in the best interest of the client and the clinician. 

Categories: Ethics


I'm Iren!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out