The the vouchers say that they will drain

Published by admin on

The debate over whether or not the United States government should
grant tuition vouchers to the parents of children who attend private schools has
gone on for many years, and has included many powerful arguments on both
sides of the issue. Those who support the private school vouchers believe that
they are beneficial to everyone because they promote productivity in both public
and private schools alike, and they also give low-income families the chance to
give their children a quality private school education. Those in opposition to the
vouchers say that they will drain money out of the public schools, and that they
only truly help a small population, mainly the wealthy and advantaged.
Opposers also believe that the vouchers interfere with the Separation of Church
and State, since many private schools have a religious affiliation. This issue has
truly been a controversial one, with many people fighting arduously. After
reading through the various arguments for each side, one can not help but come
to their own conclusion about private school vouchers.

There have been many school voucher programs proposed in the past,
but they all seem to share one common theme. This similarity between them is
that they all promote giving households that send their children to private schools
a tax dollar-funded voucher that would cover all or most of the cost of the
school’s tuition. Many of the proposals also include the right for parents to chose
which private school their child will attend. The vouchers allows students to use
the money that would be subsidized for them in a public school to go toward a
private school education. This system redirects the flow of educational funding,
bringing it to the individual family instead of the school district.

The idea of school vouchers first became popular after Milton Friedman,
an economist, released two publications, in 1956 and in 1962, that supported the
voucher plan. In his 1962 book, Capitalism and Freedom, when Friedman
discusses education, he turns to public education criticizes it for being
“unresponsive” because it has been free from competition (Lieberman, 120).
Vouchers would provide this much needed competition, since public schools
would now have to contend with the private schools that were receiving the same
payments they were. Friedman believes that,
“most dissatisfied parents have only two options. They can enroll their
children in private schools, in which case they have to bear the costs in
addition to paying taxes to support public schools. Or they can resort to
political action, an option Friedman regards as ineffective.” (ibid.)
After Friedman publicly showed his support for school vouchers, a debate began
in America, with fellow supporters and the opposers announcing their views on
the issue.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

People on both sides of this issue have been very vocal over the years,
explaining why they think school vouchers should or should not be implemented
in American schools. In arguing about the same point in the debate, like the
decline in the quality of public schools or the separation of church and state,
each group has found a way to make it fit into their beliefs. Therefore, nothing is
ever accomplished because the groups blame each other for any problems
involved with the vouchers that may arise. Besides the two points listed above,
minority education and low-income student education have also been used as
powerful arguments both for and against private school vouchers.


Categories: United States


I'm Iren!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out