During a father, brother, or significant others who

Published by admin on

During this class period today, seven adult men will be falsely accused of
committing a serious crime, carrying a penalty of capital punishment. This means
approximately 51,000 adult men are falsely accused of committing serious crimes
each year. This figure is roughly the number of people who attended Super
Bowl-Thirty-Three. Currently, there are 3,500 people on death row in
thirty-eight states that support and carry out the death penalty while only
twelve states have outlawed it. At the same time, more than half the countries
in the world have abolished the death penalty in law or practice. Capital
punishment is very relevant to each member of society. It is not just a male
only issue. Every single one of us in this room has a father, brother, or
significant others who could be affected. Capital punishment in America is
morally unjust and should be eliminated because it is cruel and unusual; it
kills innocent people; and it is used in a discriminatory manner. Sometimes
criminals suffer more during their executions than is anticipated or planned.

People sentenced to death are certain to face one of the following methods of
execution still practiced today: firing squad, electric chair, lethal injection,
gas chamber or hanging. But, injecting with poisonous chemicals, smothering with
toxic gases, and electrocuting with high voltage are the preferred methods
because bloody human tissues are not strewn about, as with other methods,
therefore those people assigned to scour the execution site are less likely to
experience psychological trauma. Although tidy, these styles of killing rarely
succeed on the first attempt; instead, prisoners regularly suffer intense pain
for long periods of time before expiring. According to Seideman, the case of
Scotty Sutton is one example of many bungled executions that take place every
month. While administering a lethal injection, all the executioners attempts
to find a vein have failed. Scotty started moaning and heaving in agony
signaling a partial dose found his blood stream. Realizing the dose was not
enough to end his life the executioner tried several failed attempts in the neck
area hoping to find a main artery. Meanwhile, 300 pound, Scotty is still
breathing after five minutes into this botched execution. The chemicals that
were prepared and on hand have been seriously depleted. In a last ditch effort,
the executioner signaled for help and directed a prison staff member to cut away
a portion of the thick canvas jacket to expose an area of his chest to deliver a
lethal dose directly into his heart; moments later Scotty expired (3). Another
example that is equally as cruel as lethal injection is the gas chamber. This
method of execution places a prisoner in a cell that fills with cyanide gas. The
symptoms of dying first start with tears falling uncontrollably from the eyes.

Then, snot and bodily fluids run unobstructed from the nose. Also, puss dribbles
out the mouth, and blisters form on the skin about the face. Finally, breathing
is restricted and the heart stops. This process can take eight minutes that may
seem like eight hours to the prisoner. Another account of inhumane punishment
comes from witnessing a prisoners execution in the electric chair. Science
has not determined how long an electrocuted individual retains consciousness,
but when the switch is thrown, the body jerks, smoke frequently rises from the
head, and there is a smell of burning flesh (Seideman 4). For example, one case
in May 1990, Jessie Tafero, a Florida prisoner, gurgled and his head bobbed
while ashes fell from it, for four minutes (Seideman 5). Another case in July
1986, Kevin Barnes, an Alabama prisoner, took three jolts of electricity and ten
minutes before being pronounced dead (Seideman 5). In the Chicago Tribune report
on Miscarriages of Justice, it was reported that since 1975 at least 381
innocent people have been convicted of capital crimes they did not commit
(Armstrong). Guilty criminals deserve to die for the horrible acts they commit,
not innocent people. The Death penalty practiced is far from humane; in fact, it
is downright torturous in many cases and Heaven forbid if we send an innocent
person to death row. Every time the state kills an innocent person, justice has
failed; sympathy from our hearts goes to families suffering from grief; then,
the peoples business is soon back to normal. This tragic cycle will continue
until capital punishment is outlawed. Occasionally killing an innocent person
while in the process of trying to kill guilty criminals is unacceptable. The
Chicago Tribune conducted a study and analyzed thousands of court records from
across the country to find some disturbing news. Research has revealed that,
with impunity, prosecutors across the country have violated their oaths and the
law, committing the worst kinds of deceptions in the most serious of cases
(Armstrong 1). Hiding or presenting false evidence was the prosecutors
strategy to deceive the courts and win their case; they knew they would not get
punished. Armstrong reports, they have prosecuted black men, hiding evidence
that the real killers were white. They have prosecuted a wife, hiding evidence
her husband committed suicide. They have prosecuted parents, hiding evidence
their daughter was killed by wild dogs (Armstrong). Studies show, since 1975
at least 381 innocent people have had their conviction thrown out (Armstrong 2).

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Dishonest lawyers who represent our justice system should be held accountable
for the deaths of those innocent people convicted of crimes they did not commit.

A report released by the Chicago Tribune points out that recent advances in DNA
technology have stirred the hopes of many prisoners that may be innocent and
looking for a loop hole in getting another chance to appeal. As a result, 1000
new cases crowd the courts, and 75 of which are death row prisoners (Armstrong
5). Verneal Jimerson of Illinois and Kirk Bloodsworth of Maryland, both were
later exonerated by DNA tests, but not before spending 5 years in prison
(Armstrong). Capital punishment is prone to killing innocent people. A court
error can be corrected with a pardon but a pardon after death is not valued to
anyone (Seideman 2). Race is an important factor in determining who is sentenced
to die. When dealing with race, statistics are important because they provide
facts that are unbiased and indisputable. Martin Luther King said, sometimes
a law is just on its face and unjust on its application (King 159). Meaning
intentions are good but its outcome is unjust. With capital punishment, the
statistics present the big picture by revealing that biased judgments were made
along racial lines and therefore must be examined first. Then, each court case
is examined to enumerate the evidence that supports our conclusion drawn from
the statistics. For example, statistics shows that, during 1997-1998 the
population of our country was 252.7 million. 72.9 percent of this amount was
white, yet whites accounted for only 49.1 percent of prison inmates, while
blacks who accounted for only 15.3 percent of the entire population, accounted
for 47.3 percent of prison inmates. The statistics are similar for the
population on death row and executions (Cabana 1). These statistics suggest a
racial problem does exist but is not enough to make a claim. Each case is now
examined; the evidence that supports the claim is enumerated; the result is a
well thought out explanation of the problem. For example, after carefully
studying the statistics the General Accounting Office released a report in 1990
that insists the race of the victim in capital murder cases influenced whether
prosecutors would pursue the death penalty or not. In particular, it insists
that, a black man who kills a white person is 11 times more likely to receive
the death penalty than a white man who kills a black person (Fernando 1). In
simpler terms, the law does not stand for torture or racism; instead, it honors
due process and equal justice for all. The law promises we punish criminals but
fails to eliminate wrongful convictions. It is not necessary to kill someone as
punishment because when the person is dead, you are not punishing him; you are
punishing only the people who love him. These victims would benefit far more if
the funds used for appeals were diverted to the provisions of counseling and
other assistance. Racism continues to play an unacceptable role in capital
punishment. In death penalty cases the race of the victim is much more important
than the prior criminal record of the defender or the actual circumstances of
the crime. More than half of those on death row are people of color, although
they represent about six percent of the U.S. population, about forty percent of
those on death row are African American. On the basis of race, the death penalty
still discriminates against minorities; therefore, our principles of justice and
fairness are being selectively applied. Currently in America we have not a
system of justice, but injustice.
*http//sun.soci.niu.edu/~critcrim/wrong/tribpros10.html* Seideman, David,
(1998, June17-last updated). Executions and Suffering Accessed: March 17, 1999.

*http://ethics/ucsd.edu/death.penalty.html Fernando, Javier, (1994,
April-creation date). American Justice in America Accessed: March 10, 1999.

*http://www.miamicity.com/miami/literadeath.html* Cabana, Don, (1998-
copyright). Death Penalty Statistics Accessed: March 20, 1999 *http://www.theelectricchair.com/stats.htm*
Legal Issues

Categories: Accounting

DEATH human rights. Is the worst violation

Published by admin on

DEATH PENALTY IN THE PHILIPPINES: ARE YOU IN FAVOR? OR NOT?? Introduction: For the past few years, Death penalty has been a big issue to our country. Some people are in favor of it, but most are not. Just imagine our country if death penalty is on the go? My view: Death penalty is a way to lessen crime in our country. Death penalty controls crime in some countries like China. As we all know, death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a way of sentencing someone to death because of a certain committed crime, and is the sentence of death upon a person by the state as a punishment for an offence.

Just remember last march 2011 when three Overseas Filipino Workers were sentenced to death because of drug trafficking. Our country begged for the OFWs lives but china still sentenced them to death. And this coming Thursday, (December 8, 2011) another overseas Filipino worker was again sentenced to death because he as caught with an illegal drug called “heroine”. Death penalty is also a way to lessen those people in who are being put into prison, people who are committing crime. If death penalty or capital punishment will be once again executed here in our country, maybe most Filipinos would be afraid to commit crime after all.

Counter argument: Capital punishment is often opposed on the grounds that innocent people will inevitably be executed. Death penalty or capital punishment is against human rights. Is the worst violation of human rights, because the right to life is the most important, and judicial execution violates it without necessity and inflict to the condemned torture. According to Albert Camus (wrote in a 1956 book called “Reflections on the Guillotine, Resistance, and Rebellion & Death”) “Execution is not simply death.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

It is just as different from the privation of life as a concentration camp is from prison. For there to be an equivalency, the death penalty would have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible death on him and who, from that moment onward, had confined him at his mercy for months. Such a monster is not encountered in private life. ” Conclusion: From the facts that I stated above i think death penalty is very much racist. In conclusion, the death penalty may seem to be the best course of action in committing a crime.


DEATH seventy-six five hundred fifty-two executions have occurred

Published by admin on

The death penalty has been a staple in the justice system of America
since its inception. Though very controversial, it has stood the test of time as
the ultimate punishment. Many countries are currently abolishing their death
penalty practice. America, on the other hand, has thirty-eight of fifty states
with laws regarding the death penalty. It seems the United States requires the
death penalty more than ever due to the increased rate of violent crime. Since
nineteen ninety more than three hundred fifty people have been put to death
with another three thousand three hundred in the waiting on death row. On a
larger scale, since nineteen seventy-six five hundred fifty-two executions have
occurred in the United States, the breakdown is as follows: three hundred
ninety-four by lethal injection, one hundred forty-one by electrocution, eleven
by gas chamber, three by hanging, and two by firing squad. Half of the post-
nineteen seventy-six executions have occurred within the last five years,
including fifty-two so far this year. Although the death penalty has brought
many viscous criminals to a fitting end, the process by which the death
penalty is based upon is an inconsistent one. The system of tangled appeals,
court orders, and last minute pardons has rendered the entire system
ineffective. As displayed by the swelling of the stagnant pool of death row
inmates, criminals are not deterred by the punishment.An evil deed is not
redeemed by an evil deed of retaliation. Justice is never advanced in the
taking of human life. Morality is never upheld by legalized murder.
Many loopholes exist in the structure of the death penalty. The
outcome of the case is decided by the quality of the lawyer defending the
accused. Many criminals cannot afford a competent lawyer, resulting in a
greater chance of that particular person being issued the death penalty, as
opposed to life in prison. A fine line separates these two charges, and a
defendant who can afford a competent lawyer stands less of a chance of being
assigned the death penalty than one who cannot. Also studies show that the
application of the death penalty is racial biased. The amount of violent
crimes are split almost equally between the white and black ethnic groups.
Since nineteen seventy-seven eighty-two percent of the criminals assigned the
death penalty have committed the crime in question against a Caucasian.
Another glaring defect of the structure of the death penalty system in America
are the laws regarding the sentencing of criminals under the age of eighteen.
Minors can be sentenced to death in twenty-four states. Although these
criminals have indeed committed crimes that could call upon the death
penalty, they are children, with so much more learning and opportunities
ahead of them. No person who is mentally inadequate or immature should be
assigned a death penalty. Due to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, mentally
retarded people can be put to death. Over thirty mentally impaired people
have been executed since the ruling.

The death penalty is cruel and inhumane. No matter how the death
penalty is carried out, no man has the power to judge and sentence another to
death. Americans are taught that two wrongs do not make a right. This
concept is the basis of most types of religion found in America. Religion is
the basis of groups fighting the death penalty. Also, moratoriums on the
death penalty are increasing in number. Moratoriums would temporarily
suspend the death penalty while its fairness would be examined for future use.
Illinois and Nebraska both passed moratorium bills in the spring of nineteen
ninety-nine, though neither were fully passed into law. The debate of
morality in the death penalty is not a new one. The Supreme Court ruled that
execution is a violation of the Eighth Amendment, which protects United
States citizens from cruel and unusual punishment. , on June twenty-ninth,
nineteen seventy-two. The individual states stopped executions in nineteen
sixty-seven awaiting the ruling of this case. However in July of nineteen
seventy-six the death penalty was upheld by the Supreme Court as a righteous
punishment for some crimes. For nine years, the death penalty was
suspended.The United States did not encounter an immense crime increase
when considering two factors that the United States was faced with at the
time of this court ruling: the onslaught of the Vietnam Conflict, and the racial
tensions sparked by the Civil Rights movement of the mid-sixties.
Category: History

Categories: United States


I'm Iren!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out